Jordan Thompson vs Vit Kopriva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• On second serve performance in the past six months, Thompson demonstrates superiority, securing 50.78% compared to Kopriva's 43.14%. Could this advantage translate into overall match dominance?
• Kopriva excels in return games, capturing 48.57% of points on opponents' second serves, whereas Thompson has 39.46%. Does this indicate a potential edge when facing serve?
• In first serve returns, Kopriva again leads with 29.04% of successful returns over Thompson's 22.91%, underlining his return game strength.
• Regarding breakpoints, Thompson has managed to save 60% under pressure versus Kopriva's 52.99%, suggesting resilience in critical situations.
• Analyzing win rates over the last year, Kopriva boasts a 65.28% success rate as opposed to Thompson's 57.14%. Does this indicate greater consistency?
• Kopriva's best performances are on clay courts with a 61% win rate, contrasting with Thompson's preference for indoor hard courts, where he achieves 65% success.
• In terms of competition level, Thompson competes more on the main tour compared to Kopriva’s Challenger/ITF focus, potentially facing tougher opponents.
• Thompson's average opposition ranking of 63.43 significantly surpasses Kopriva's 246.43, showing he frequently competes against higher-ranked players.
• In deciding sets, Kopriva claims 74% of victories, indicating robustness in high-pressure scenarios, exceeding Thompson's 57% win rate.
• Kopriva converts 35.86% of breakpoint chances, slightly higher than Thompson's 32.89%, a pivotal factor during critical match junctures.

Editorial Prediction (June 28, 2025, UTC):

In assessing the upcoming tennis match between Kopriva and Thompson, several key statistics offer insight into potential outcomes. Thompson's recent strength in winning points off second serves gives him an advantage, suggesting greater stability in service games.

Kopriva, on the other hand, demonstrates formidable skills in return games, particularly against second serves, which could challenge Thompson's serve efficacy. Kopriva also exhibits more pronounced success on clay courts, which might become advantageous if the match is played on this surface.

The difference in player exposure to competition levels is noteworthy, with Thompson consistently facing higher-ranked opponents, possibly translating to greater match experience under pressure.

However, Kopriva's superior performance in deciding sets indicates a tenacity that may tip the balance during crucial match moments.

Considering all factors, including play styles, strengths, and surface preferences, Thompson appears to have a slight edge in this matchup. Therefore, Thompson is more likely to emerge victorious in this tennis encounter.